Irreality of Fact

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Stig Alstrup Rasmussen]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
SATS, 4/2(2003-11), 45-66
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 37885822X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 37885822X
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123340.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e200311 xx s 000 0 mul
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/SATS.2003.45  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/SATS.2003.45 
100 1 |a Rasmussen  |D Stig Alstrup  |u Department of Philosophy, University of Copenhagen. sar@hum.ku.dk 
245 1 0 |a Irreality of Fact  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Stig Alstrup Rasmussen] 
520 3 |a It is argued that C. Wright's worry over the Basic Argument for Quitism is misplaced since the argument is incoherent. An even more basic argument is considered, and some consequences traced for, inter alia, the Tractarian view in metaphysics and Dummett's Metaphor Thesis, connecting ontology and semantics. In the course of the argument, work by, primarily, C. Peacocke and J. McDowell is touched upon. 
540 |a © Philosophia Press 2003 
773 0 |t SATS  |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG  |g 4/2(2003-11), 45-66  |x 1600-1974  |q 4:2<45  |1 2003  |2 4  |o SATS 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2003.45  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2003.45  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Rasmussen  |D Stig Alstrup  |u Department of Philosophy, University of Copenhagen. sar@hum.ku.dk 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t SATS  |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG  |g 4/2(2003-11), 45-66  |x 1600-1974  |q 4:2<45  |1 2003  |2 4  |o SATS 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter