Why epidemiology of endocrine disruptors warrants the precautionary principle

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Michael Gochfeld]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
Pure and Applied Chemistry, 75/11-12(2003-01-01), 2521-2529
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378861646
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378861646
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123348.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20030101xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1351/pac200375112521  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1351/pac200375112521 
100 1 |a Gochfeld  |D Michael  |u Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA 
245 1 0 |a Why epidemiology of endocrine disruptors warrants the precautionary principle  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Michael Gochfeld] 
520 3 |a The precautionary principle is controversial, and critics invoke the need to wait for "sound science" before taking "costly" regulatory action. For human health effects, epidemiologic results are often considered more valuable than toxicologic studies in animals. Direct human evidence on the endocrine effects of environmental chemicals has been slow to accumulate because of inherent sample size limitations of exposed populations and over-conservative hypothesis testing approaches. Moreover, human health outcomes may take decades to emerge. Indeed, even huge population-based studies of hormone replacement therapy have been inconclusive regarding both benefits and risks. This paper argues that certain intrinsic standard epidemiologic methods are stacked to avoid making a type I error. Moreover, these combine with extrinsic limitations (long latency, high cost), leading me to conclude that reliance solely on epidemiology to provide definitive answers, will almost inevitably delay the discovery of meaningful associations warranting timely action for protection of public health. There are several ways in which the inherent conservatism of epidemiology is arrayed against preventative regulatory steps, hence a precautionary approach is warranted while awaiting the results of additional studies which for various reasons may be very long delayed or even impossible. 
540 |a © 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 
773 0 |t Pure and Applied Chemistry  |d De Gruyter  |g 75/11-12(2003-01-01), 2521-2529  |x 0033-4545  |q 75:11-12<2521  |1 2003  |2 75  |o pac 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375112521  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375112521  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Gochfeld  |D Michael  |u Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Pure and Applied Chemistry  |d De Gruyter  |g 75/11-12(2003-01-01), 2521-2529  |x 0033-4545  |q 75:11-12<2521  |1 2003  |2 75  |o pac 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter