Bootstrapping the Breusch-Godfrey autocorrelation test for a single equation dynamic model: Bootstrapping the Restricted vs. Unrestricted model
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Panagiotis Mantalos]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 9/3(2003-09-01), 257-269
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 37886694X | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123400.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20030901xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/156939603322729012 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/156939603322729012 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mantalos |D Panagiotis |u Department of Health, Science, and Mathematics, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bootstrapping the Breusch-Godfrey autocorrelation test for a single equation dynamic model: Bootstrapping the Restricted vs. Unrestricted model |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Panagiotis Mantalos] |
| 520 | 3 | |a We use Monte Carlo methods to study the properties of the bootstrap Breusch-Godfrey test for autocorrelated errors in two versions a) by bootstrapping under the null hypothesis, restricted and b) by bootstrapping under the alternative hypothesis, unrestricted. We use the residual bootstrap for the bootstrap-BG test. Our analysis regarding the size of the test reveals that both bootstrap tests have actual sizes that lie close to the nominal size, with the restricted being better. Regarding the power of the test we find that with bootstrapping under the alternative hypothesis, the unrestricted bootstrap test has the greater power in small samples. | |
| 540 | |a Copyright 2003, Walter de Gruyter | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Autocorrelation |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Bootstrap |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Breusch-Godfrey test method |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Monte Carlo Methods and Applications |d Walter de Gruyter |g 9/3(2003-09-01), 257-269 |x 0929-9629 |q 9:3<257 |1 2003 |2 9 |o mcma | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/156939603322729012 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/156939603322729012 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Mantalos |D Panagiotis |u Department of Health, Science, and Mathematics, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Monte Carlo Methods and Applications |d Walter de Gruyter |g 9/3(2003-09-01), 257-269 |x 0929-9629 |q 9:3<257 |1 2003 |2 9 |o mcma | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||