Affirmative Action and the Group-Disadvantaging Principle
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Daniel Sabbagh]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
Issues in Legal Scholarship, 2/1(2003-05-29)
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378872397 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123412.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20030529xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1539-8323.1012 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1539-8323.1012 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sabbagh |D Daniel |u 1Centre d'études et de Recherches Internationales (Paris), sabbagh@ceri-sciences-po.org | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Affirmative Action and the Group-Disadvantaging Principle |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Daniel Sabbagh] |
| 520 | 3 | |a This article starts by offering a more detailed account of how Fiss' argument in favor of the "group-disadvantaging principle" might be brought to bear on the affirmative action debate than the author actually provides, while suggesting that, appearances notwithstanding, his emphasis on group inequality at the level of constitutional theory does not require abandoning the tenets of liberal individualism at the level of moral and political theory. I will then attempt to explore further the institutional reasons why the courts failed to embrace the group-disadvantaging principle, thus linking this failure to two other major developments in past and present Equal Protection jurisprudence: Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson and Justice Powell's opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a The Origins and Fate of Antisubordination Theory |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1012 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1012 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Sabbagh |D Daniel |u 1Centre d'études et de Recherches Internationales (Paris), sabbagh@ceri-sciences-po.org | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||