Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378872419 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123412.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20030529xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1539-8323.1040 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1539-8323.1040 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kutz |D Christopher |u 1School of Law, Boalt Hall, University of California, Berkeley | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Groups, Equality, and the Promise of Democratic Politics |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Christopher Kutz] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Owen Fiss' "Groups and the Equal Protection Clause" appeared at a time when the possibilities of progress seemed boundless in overcoming U.S. racial divisions. The courts had firmly taken on the role of social reformers, redistributing status and privilege in the ways so incisively limned by his article. Since then, however, movement towards residential and educational integration has stalled if not actually retreated, a significant black-white wage gap remains, and affirmative action programs in employment and education have become widely disfavored in both judicial and popular opinion. What happened? I argue that the blame for the changing winds lies, partly and ironically, with the very conception of equal protection that Fiss promotes. His essentially remedial understanding of equal protection, according to which courts ought to block state action that perpetuates the subordination of blacks and other disadvantaged groups, and to permit or even require state action undoing the subordination, both presupposes and promotes a politics that replaces political agency with a struggle for spoils before a superior authority. What we need instead, I suggest, is an interpretation of equal protection that can support a reconstructive and enduring democratic politics. I call this understanding the "equal political agency" interpretation, and describe its implications for race-based social policy. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a The Origins and Fate of Antisubordination Theory |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1040 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1040 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Kutz |D Christopher |u 1School of Law, Boalt Hall, University of California, Berkeley | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Issues in Legal Scholarship |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2003-05-29) |q 2:1 |1 2003 |2 2 |o ils | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||