"Black" and "White" in Brown: Equal Protection and the Legal Construction of Racial Identities

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Rogers M. Smith]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
Issues in Legal Scholarship, 2/1(2003-05-29)
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378872427
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378872427
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123412.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20030529xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.2202/1539-8323.1014  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1539-8323.1014 
100 1 |a Smith  |D Rogers M.  |u 1University of Pennsylvania 
245 1 0 |a "Black" and "White" in Brown: Equal Protection and the Legal Construction of Racial Identities  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Rogers M. Smith] 
520 3 |a Owen Fiss's classic essay rightly argues that equal protection should be used to address systemic group disadvantages. It speaks, however, of racial groups as "natural" social groups, not rooted in biology, but also not created by specific legal rules. Yet American laws have always played a large role in constructing racial identities, and they have continued to do so even in the wake of Brown v. Board of Education, which sought to eliminate all legal expression of claims of racial superiority. By presenting blacks as profoundly damaged by segregation, Brown's reasoning still permitted assumptions of white superiority to continue. By recognizing that the law has been a major contributor to racial identities, and that American laws have constructed both white and black racial identities in harmful ways, we can articulate more fully how greater equality for racial groups would advance equal protection goals and genuinely benefit all. 
540 |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston 
690 7 |a The Origins and Fate of Antisubordination Theory  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Issues in Legal Scholarship  |d De Gruyter  |g 2/1(2003-05-29)  |q 2:1  |1 2003  |2 2  |o ils 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1014  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1014  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Smith  |D Rogers M.  |u 1University of Pennsylvania 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Issues in Legal Scholarship  |d De Gruyter  |g 2/1(2003-05-29)  |q 2:1  |1 2003  |2 2  |o ils 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter