A Two-Step Method for the Extraction of High-Quality RNA from Endoscopic Biopsies

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Thomas Wex, Gerhard Treiber, Uwe Lendeckel, Peter Malfertheiner]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2003
Enthalten in:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 41/8(2003-08-07), 1033-1037
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378881531
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378881531
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123433.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20030807xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/CCLM.2003.159  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/CCLM.2003.159 
245 0 2 |a A Two-Step Method for the Extraction of High-Quality RNA from Endoscopic Biopsies  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Thomas Wex, Gerhard Treiber, Uwe Lendeckel, Peter Malfertheiner] 
520 3 |a The use of molecular techniques such as quantitative RT-PCR depends on the quality of cellular RNA. In particular, RNA extraction from endoscopic biopsies is difficult with respect to yield, and especially integrity. Endoscopic biopsies taken from the gastric antrum, corpus and duodenum were subjected to various RNA extraction protocols, and the RNA was used for quantitative RT-PCR. The subsequent use of two methods, (i) a phenol/chloroform extraction and (ii) a columnbased extraction method, resulted in a yield of 4.5 μg total RNA per biopsy with reliable quality in 80% of samples. The quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that only RNA samples that clearly show both 18S-and 28S-RNA bands in agarose gel electrophoresis were suitable for quantitative RT-PCR as shown by expression of corpus-specific pepsinogen C-mRNA and the duodenum-specific multi-drug resistance protein-1 (mdr-1)-mRNA. In partially degraded RNA, pepsinogen C, mdr-1, or β-actin mRNAs were still detectable, but the quantitative determination gave inconsistent data. The two-step method described here is a suitable option for extracting high-quality RNA from endoscopic biopsies when other standard protocols fail. 
540 |a Copyright © 2003 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 
690 7 |a Medical equipment & techniques  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Medical diagnosis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Diseases & disorders  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Wex  |D Thomas  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Treiber  |D Gerhard  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lendeckel  |D Uwe  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Malfertheiner  |D Peter  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 41/8(2003-08-07), 1033-1037  |x 1434-6621  |q 41:8<1033  |1 2003  |2 41  |o cclm 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2003.159  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2003.159  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Wex  |D Thomas  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Treiber  |D Gerhard  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Lendeckel  |D Uwe  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Malfertheiner  |D Peter  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 41/8(2003-08-07), 1033-1037  |x 1434-6621  |q 41:8<1033  |1 2003  |2 41  |o cclm 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter