Reply to the opinion paper "The baby or the bathwater: which one should be discarded?”
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378882783 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123435.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20041104xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/JPM.2004.151 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/JPM.2004.151 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Geissbuehler |D Verena |u 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reply to the opinion paper "The baby or the bathwater: which one should be discarded?” |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Verena Geissbuehler] |
| 540 | |a © Walter de Gruyter | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Human reproduction, growth & development |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Gynaecology & obstetrics |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Paediatric medicine |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/6(2004-11-04), 545-546 |x 0300-5577 |q 32:6<545 |1 2004 |2 32 |o jpme | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.151 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.151 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Geissbuehler |D Verena |u 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/6(2004-11-04), 545-546 |x 0300-5577 |q 32:6<545 |1 2004 |2 32 |o jpme | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||