<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">378885510</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180305123441.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161128e20040322xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.2202/1535-1653.1117</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1535-1653.1117</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gambaro</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Antonio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1University of Milan, Antonio.Gambaro@unimi.it</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The Trento Theses</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Antonio Gambaro]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Trento Theses are founded on the assumption that the aim of comparison is to do science; the Theses give methodological indications as to how one might undertake the scientific project of legal comparison. Fourteen years after their formulation, it seems necessary to examine the epistemological status of these theses in the context of contemporary legal reflections. It is also necessary to examine if, and to what degree, the methodological indications expressed by the Trento Theses are adequate to the tasks of legal comparison in todays world. I divide my discussion in three parts. In the first part, I examine whether the Trento Theses have any enduring validity, as well as the related but distinct question of whether their formulation might create, today more so than in the past, some misunderstandings that should now be avoided. In the second part, following from the previous analysis, I suggest certain possible modifications and amendments to the Theses. In the third part, I discuss the benefits of a careful methodology to comparative research as it may be applied to analysis of European diritto comune.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative Law</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative Methodology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Legal Tradition</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Harmonisation of Law</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Jus Commune Europeum</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Global Jurist Frontiers</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/1(2004-03-22)</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">gj</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1653.1117</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1653.1117</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gambaro</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Antonio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1University of Milan, Antonio.Gambaro@unimi.it</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Global Jurist Frontiers</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/1(2004-03-22)</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">gj</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
