Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378886681 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123444.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20041025xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1553-3832.1023 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1553-3832.1023 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Posner |D Richard A. |u 1University of Chicago | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Richard A. Posner] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The question is whether it is possible to have a congestion externality in intellectual property, such as the Mickey Mouse character. Literally, the answer is no. Figuratively, it is yes. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Copyright |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a congestion |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t The Economists' Voice |d De Gruyter |g 1/2(2004-10-25) |q 1:2 |1 2004 |2 1 |o ev | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1023 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1023 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Posner |D Richard A. |u 1University of Chicago | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t The Economists' Voice |d De Gruyter |g 1/2(2004-10-25) |q 1:2 |1 2004 |2 1 |o ev | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||