Crawford v Washington: A View from Across the Atlantic
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378891138 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123455.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20041214xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1554-4567.1025 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1554-4567.1025 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Choo |D Andrew |u Professor of Law, Brunel University; Barrister, Matrix Chambers | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Crawford v Washington: A View from Across the Atlantic |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Andrew Choo] |
| 520 | 3 | |a This article considers the decision in Crawford v Washington from an English perspective. In doing so, it examines the implications of the major changes to criminal hearsay doctrine in England and Wales that are currently being introduced. It also examines the implications of the presence in the European Convention on Human Rights, which has been effectively incorporated into English domestic law, of a guarantee similar to that provided by the US confrontation clause. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t International Commentary on Evidence |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2004-12-14) |q 2:1 |1 2004 |2 2 |o ice | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1025 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1025 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Choo |D Andrew |u Professor of Law, Brunel University; Barrister, Matrix Chambers | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t International Commentary on Evidence |d De Gruyter |g 2/1(2004-12-14) |q 2:1 |1 2004 |2 2 |o ice | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||