caa a22 4500 378891146 CHVBK 20181103083202.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20041101xx s 000 0 eng 10.2202/1554-4567.1018 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1554-4567.1018 Summers Sarah J. Researcher, University of Zurich, Switzerland The Right to Confrontation after Crawford v. Washington: A 'Continental European' Perspective [Elektronische Daten] [Sarah J Summers] The judgment of the US Supreme Court in Crawford v Washington represents a significant development in the law of evidence in the United States. The judgment itself sets out a less than complimentary view of the evidential and procedural laws of continental Europe. This article aims, through an examination of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, to assess the accuracy of this view and to offer a comparative analysis of the confrontation principles in Europe and the United States. ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston Evidential Rules nationallicence Confrontation nationallicence Article 6 ECHR nationallicence International Commentary on Evidence De Gruyter 2/1(2004-11-01) 2:1 2004 2 ice https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1018 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1018 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Summers Sarah J. Researcher, University of Zurich, Switzerland NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- International Commentary on Evidence De Gruyter 2/1(2004-11-01) 2:1 2004 2 ice CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence SWISSBIB 378891146 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter