caa a22 4500 378891154 CHVBK 20180305123455.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20041101xx s 000 0 eng 10.2202/1554-4567.1017 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1554-4567.1017 Nance Dale A. Case Western Reserve University Rethinking Confrontation after Crawford [Elektronische Daten] [Dale A. Nance] A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court has substantially changed the formal interpretation of the Confrontation Clause. This essay argues that it is important to recognize the more fundamental change that the case represents, a change in the rationale lying behind the doctrine. Ultimately, this more fundamental change shifts the constitutional doctrine from a focus on preventing jury error to a focus on preventing prosecutorial abuse. Whether this laudable shift will be fully effectuated in the details of the doctrine remains to be seen. ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston confrontation nationallicence hearsay nationallicence cross-examination nationallicence testimony nationallicence International Commentary on Evidence De Gruyter 2/1(2004-11-01) 2:1 2004 2 ice https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1017 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1017 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Nance Dale A. Case Western Reserve University NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- International Commentary on Evidence De Gruyter 2/1(2004-11-01) 2:1 2004 2 ice CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter