Performance evaluation of automated assays for β-CrossLaps, N-MID-Osteocalcin and intact parathyroidhormone (BIOROSE Multicenter Study)

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Heinrich Schmidt-Gayk, Eberhard Spanuth, Jochem Kötting, Reiner Bartl, Dieter Felsenberg, Johannes Pfeilschifter, Friedhelm Raue, Heinz Jürgen Roth]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 42/1(2004-02-16), 90-95
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 37889790X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 37889790X
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123510.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20040216xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/CCLM.2004.017  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/CCLM.2004.017 
245 0 0 |a Performance evaluation of automated assays for β-CrossLaps, N-MID-Osteocalcin and intact parathyroidhormone (BIOROSE Multicenter Study)  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Heinrich Schmidt-Gayk, Eberhard Spanuth, Jochem Kötting, Reiner Bartl, Dieter Felsenberg, Johannes Pfeilschifter, Friedhelm Raue, Heinz Jürgen Roth] 
520 3 |a Introduction: Biochemical markers of bone metabolism have been mainly determined manually until now and the precision and accuracy of these methods have not always been satisfactory. This has been shown in several external quality assessment schemes (EQAS). Objective and study design: A study named BIOROSE was undertaken to evaluate new automated assays for serum markers of bone metabolism. The main focus was to evaluate the assay performance in a multicenter setting with 20 laboratories participating in Germany. The evaluation consists of a familiarization phase to determine precision and accuracy and an EQAS to evaluate the comparability between laboratories. Materials: The parameters β-CrossLaps (CTX), N-MID-Osteocalcin (OC) and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured with reagents including calibrators and control sera obtained from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany, with electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) on the automated analyzer Elecsys 2010. Results: We calculated for the control samples, PCB 1-3, the mean and median values from the measured values of all participating laboratories and used these as target values. From these target values, a recovery range for the participating laboratories was calculated for β-CrossLaps, OC and intact PTH of better than 80-126% for PCB 2 and PCB 3, and for PCB 1 (low concentration range) for β-CrossLaps 79-129%, OC 90-120% and intact PTH 78-126%. The between-day imprecision was 2.4-7.2% for β-CrossLaps, 1.1-5.9% for OC and 1.7-5.5% for intact PTH in the elevated range (sample PCB 2). In the EQAS, the inter-laboratory imprecision for β-CrossLaps in the sample with a value of 0.8 ng/ml (above the upper limit of normal, which is 0.6 ng/ml) was 9.8% on day 1 and 9.7% on day 2. Conclusion: The performance evaluation of automated assays for β-CrossLaps, N-MID-Osteocalcin and intact parathyroid hormone in the BIOROSE multicenter study showed that the participating laboratories had no problems in setting up these methods and they yielded results for precision and accuracy that are superior to results achieved in external quality assessment schemes for manually performed methods. In addition, at the clinically important decision level of the upper limit of the normal range, all three tested analytes gave precise results that improved medical decisions. 
540 |a Copyright © 2004 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 
690 7 |a Medical equipment & techniques  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Medical diagnosis  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Diseases & disorders  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Schmidt-Gayk  |D Heinrich  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Spanuth  |D Eberhard  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kötting  |D Jochem  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bartl  |D Reiner  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Felsenberg  |D Dieter  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pfeilschifter  |D Johannes  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Raue  |D Friedhelm  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roth  |D Heinz Jürgen  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 42/1(2004-02-16), 90-95  |x 1434-6621  |q 42:1<90  |1 2004  |2 42  |o cclm 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.017  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.017  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Schmidt-Gayk  |D Heinrich  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Spanuth  |D Eberhard  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kötting  |D Jochem  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Bartl  |D Reiner  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Felsenberg  |D Dieter  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Pfeilschifter  |D Johannes  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Raue  |D Friedhelm  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Roth  |D Heinz Jürgen  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 42/1(2004-02-16), 90-95  |x 1434-6621  |q 42:1<90  |1 2004  |2 42  |o cclm 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter