Foreign Portfolio Investment Improves Performance: Evidence from the Czech Republic

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Andrew Weiss, Georgiy A Nikitin]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4/1(2004-06-07)
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378898884
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378898884
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123513.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20040607xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.2202/1538-0653.1205  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1538-0653.1205 
245 0 0 |a Foreign Portfolio Investment Improves Performance: Evidence from the Czech Republic  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Andrew Weiss, Georgiy A Nikitin] 
520 3 |a When foreigners became the major shareholders of publicly traded firms in the Czech Republic, those firms experienced improvements in performance and increases in investment. In contrast, controlling for ownership type, ownership concentration had no independent effect on performance or investment. The results are robust to the estimation technique used, the choice of independent variables, and the methods used to control for selection bias. 
540 |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston 
690 7 |a C23  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a G11  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a G32  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a G34  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a L10  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a M14  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a O12  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a O16  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a O52  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a P23  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a P27  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a P33  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a P34  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Transition Economies  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Foreign Ownership and Control  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Portfolio Investment  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Ownership Concentration  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Long Differences  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Weiss  |D Andrew  |u Boston University, aweiss@bu.edu  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nikitin  |D Georgiy A.  |u Boston University, nikitin@bu.edu  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy  |d De Gruyter  |g 4/1(2004-06-07)  |q 4:1  |1 2004  |2 4  |o bejeap 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1205  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1205  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Weiss  |D Andrew  |u Boston University, aweiss@bu.edu  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Nikitin  |D Georgiy A.  |u Boston University, nikitin@bu.edu  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy  |d De Gruyter  |g 4/1(2004-06-07)  |q 4:1  |1 2004  |2 4  |o bejeap 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter