Toll Competition Among Congested Roads
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Eduardo M Engel, Ronald Fischer, Alexander Galetovic]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4/1(2004-03-13)
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378899007 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20200325081032.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20040313xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1538-0653.1246 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1538-0653.1246 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Toll Competition Among Congested Roads |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Eduardo M Engel, Ronald Fischer, Alexander Galetovic] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Roads are being franchised to private firms in many countries, raising the issue of regulating the tolls they charge. When there is more than one road to get from one point to another, regulation need not be necessary, since competition may substitute for toll regulation. This paper studies toll competition among private asymmetric roads subject to congestion. We obtain two main results. First, in equilibrium tolls are higher than optimal, that is, there is too little congestion. This happens because road owners internalize the reduction in drivers' willingness to pay due to congestion, thereby softening competition. It follows that the drawback of private competition is exercise of market power, not excessive congestion as is sometimes conjectured. Second, the distortion becomes smaller as market size and the number of roads grow, even if the density of drivers does not change. In the limit tolls converge to the socially optimal level and are just enough to make each driver internalize the congestion externality. This suggests that the scope for competition is better in larger networks. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Private toll roads |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a congestion |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a competition |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Engel |D Eduardo M. |u Yale University, eduardo.engel@yale.edu |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fischer |D Ronald |u Universidad de Chile, rfischer@dii.uchile.cl |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Galetovic |D Alexander |u Universidad de Chile, agaleto@dii.uchile.cl |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy |d De Gruyter |g 4/1(2004-03-13) |q 4:1 |1 2004 |2 4 |o bejeap | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1246 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1246 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Engel |D Eduardo M. |u Yale University, eduardo.engel@yale.edu |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Fischer |D Ronald |u Universidad de Chile, rfischer@dii.uchile.cl |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Galetovic |D Alexander |u Universidad de Chile, agaleto@dii.uchile.cl |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy |d De Gruyter |g 4/1(2004-03-13) |q 4:1 |1 2004 |2 4 |o bejeap | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 986 | |a SWISSBIB |b 378899007 | ||
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||