What Do We Know About Cross-subsidization? Evidence from Merging Firms
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Judith Chevalier]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4/1(2004-04-18)
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378899074 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123513.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20040418xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1538-0637.1218 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1538-0637.1218 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chevalier |D Judith |u 1Yale University, judith.chevalier@yale.edu | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Do We Know About Cross-subsidization? Evidence from Merging Firms |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Judith Chevalier] |
| 520 | 3 | |a A substantial empirical literature documents value-destroying "cross-subsidization” among the divisions of diversified firms. However, this literature relies upon two maintained hypotheses: that divisions of diversified firms are randomly allocated to their corporate parents and that the investment opportunities facing conglomerate divisions are identical to those of stand-alone firms in their industries. I examine the investment behavior prior to merger of a sample of firms that undertook diversifying mergers between 1980 and 1995. I show that, in my sample, investment patterns that the literature has attributed to cross-subsidization between divisions are apparent in the pairs of merging firms prior to their mergers. Thus, some of the cross-subsidization results in the literature may be attributable to selection bias. I also examine stock market responses to announcements of diversifying acquisitions. The event responses are largely independent of measures of the extent to which the merger is diversifying. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a diversification |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a investment |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy |d De Gruyter |g 4/1(2004-04-18) |q 4:1 |1 2004 |2 4 |o bejeap | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1218 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1218 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Chevalier |D Judith |u 1Yale University, judith.chevalier@yale.edu | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy |d De Gruyter |g 4/1(2004-04-18) |q 4:1 |1 2004 |2 4 |o bejeap | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||