In vitro AND In vivo WATER STRESS IN SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)

Verfasser / Beitragende:
ESTRÉS HÍDRICO EN GIRASOL (Helianthus annuus L.) EN LAS CONDICIONES in vitro e in vivo / STRESS D'EAU DU TOURNESOL (Helianthus annus L.) DANS LES CONDITIONS In vitro ET In vivo / [H. Turhan, I. Baser]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
HELIA, 27/40(2004-07-01), 227-236
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378901869
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378901869
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123519.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20040701xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.2298/hel0440227t  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2298/hel0440227t 
245 0 0 |a In vitro AND In vivo WATER STRESS IN SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.)  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c ESTRÉS HÍDRICO EN GIRASOL (Helianthus annuus L.) EN LAS CONDICIONES in vitro e in vivo / STRESS D'EAU DU TOURNESOL (Helianthus annus L.) DANS LES CONDITIONS In vitro ET In vivo / [H. Turhan, I. Baser] 
520 3 |a In this research, we investigated the response of sunflower cultivars to drought stress under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. Murashige and Skoog basal medium supplemented with a range of polyethylene glycol (PEG- 1000) concentrations was used for in vitro drought screening. Results from both in vitro and in vitro experiments showed that plant growth decreased with increasing PEG concentrations. In addition, there were differences between the cultivars in terms of their response to drought. The significant correlations between in vitro (except number of roots) and in vivo characters indicate that an in vitro approach could be useful in screening and selecting for drought response prior to field trial. As a result, all invitro characters measured (except number of roots) could give clues for performance of sunflower genotypes against drought in vivo. 
540 |a This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 
690 7 |a drought  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a plant growth  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a PEG  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a screening  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a tissue culture  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Turhan  |D H.  |u Field Crops Department, Agricultural Faculty, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17020-Çanakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Baser  |D I.  |u Field Crops Department, Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, Trakya University, 59100-Tekirdag, Turkey  |4 aut 
773 0 |t HELIA  |d De Gruyter  |g 27/40(2004-07-01), 227-236  |x 1018-1806  |q 27:40<227  |1 2004  |2 27  |o helia 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2298/hel0440227t  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.2298/hel0440227t  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Turhan  |D H.  |u Field Crops Department, Agricultural Faculty, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17020-Çanakkale, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Baser  |D I.  |u Field Crops Department, Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, Trakya University, 59100-Tekirdag, Turkey  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t HELIA  |d De Gruyter  |g 27/40(2004-07-01), 227-236  |x 1018-1806  |q 27:40<227  |1 2004  |2 27  |o helia 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter