caa a22 4500 37890759X CHVBK 20180305123533.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20041230xx s 000 0 eng 10.2202/1542-0485.1106 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1542-0485.1106 Domina David A. DominaLaw pc llo, Omaha, Nebraska, USA Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiffs' Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.: Response to Comment [Elektronische Daten] [David A. Domina] Thomas C. Green's comment on the article "Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom: The Plaintiffs' Argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc." Vol. 2 [2004], Article 8, ignores hundreds of exhibits, thousands of data parts, extensive testimony, and resorts to name calling.Proof is not litter, and evidence is not rank speculation. Inferences from evidence may be characterized by opposing counsel as "baseless opinion," and this is the substance of advocacy.But the Court's first trial ruling was correctly described in the original article. Mr. Green refers not to the Court's Order entering judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury's verdict, but, instead, to an Order concerning taxation of costs. ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston Law and Economics nationallicence Pickett nationallicence Tyson nationallicence captive supplies nationallicence Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization De Gruyter 2/1(2004-12-30) 2:1 2004 2 jafio https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1106 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1106 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Domina David A. DominaLaw pc llo, Omaha, Nebraska, USA NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization De Gruyter 2/1(2004-12-30) 2:1 2004 2 jafio CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence SWISSBIB 378907557 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter