<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">378908294</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180305123535.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161128e20040920xx      s     000 0 ger  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.3.376</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.3.376</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Klein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wolf Peter</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Deskriptive statt präskriptiver Sprachwissenschaft!? [Descriptive instead of prescriptive linguistics!?]</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Wolf Peter Klein]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">It is one of the main aims of modern linguistics to describe rather than prescribe linguistic forms and their uses. Normally, descriptive and prescriptive ways of reflecting on language are seen as antagonistic; e.g. a grammarian is either a descriptivist or a prescriptivist. In contrast to this antagonistic conception, the paper argues that the designation of a grammar as descriptive or prescriptive is rather a matter of scale than of antagonism. To hold this thesis, four dimensions are investigated in detail. A grammar might be classified as descriptive or prescriptive by analyzing the intention of its author (Autordimension), its reception (Rezipientendimension), its formulation as a text (Textdimension) and the ways a grammar extracts and treats linguistic data (Datendimension). On the basis of this assumption prescriptive ways of thinking about language are seen as inevitable even for modern linguists. This might be less of a problem than modern linguists have always presumed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">32/3(2004-09-20), 376-405</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0301-3294</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">32:3&lt;376</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">32</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">zfgl</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.3.376</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.3.376</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Klein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wolf Peter</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">32/3(2004-09-20), 376-405</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0301-3294</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">32:3&lt;376</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">32</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">zfgl</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
