Minimum Risk Acceptance Sampling Plans: A Review
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[K. Subramani]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Economic Quality Control, 19/1(2004-04), 121-126
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378910221 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123539.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e200404 xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/EQC.2004.121 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/EQC.2004.121 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Subramani |D K. |u Department of Mathematics, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641 006 Tamil Nadu, India | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Minimum Risk Acceptance Sampling Plans: A Review |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [K. Subramani] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Since the first acceptance sampling plans have been developed almost 80 years ago, a number of selection principles have emerged. The majority of these principles is characterized by the fact that they look upon producer and consumer as two opposing parties. However, in many occasions, e.g., in final inspection, producer and consumer represent the same party and, therefore, the used sampling plan should not make an attempt to discriminate between their interests. In this case the interest is to avoid wrong decisions, i.e., reject product of sufficient quality and accept product of insufficient quality. Thus, the natural objective in these cases is to use the overall risk for a wrong decision as optimization criteria. This is the case with so-called "minimum risks sampling plans”, which are reviewed in this paper so as to make them better known to those responsible for quality control. | |
| 540 | |a © Heldermann Verlag | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Economic Quality Control |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |g 19/1(2004-04), 121-126 |x 0940-5151 |q 19:1<121 |1 2004 |2 19 |o EQC | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/EQC.2004.121 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/EQC.2004.121 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Subramani |D K. |u Department of Mathematics, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641 006 Tamil Nadu, India | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Economic Quality Control |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |g 19/1(2004-04), 121-126 |x 0940-5151 |q 19:1<121 |1 2004 |2 19 |o EQC | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||