ON THE NONGEMINATION OF /r/ IN WEST GERMANIC TWENTY-ONE YEARS LATER

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[T. A. HALL]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Folia Linguistica Historica, 38/Historica vol. 25,1-2(2004), 211-234
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378911406
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378911406
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123542.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128s2004 xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/flih.2004.25.1-2.211  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/flih.2004.25.1-2.211 
100 1 |a HALL  |D T. A.  |u I would like to thank Carlos Gussenhoven, Silke Hamann, Wolfgang Kehrein, and Marzena Zygis for comments on earlier incarnations of this article. Special thanks are due to Carlos Gussenhoven, who communicated to me similar ideas concerning the phonetic motivation for the constraints posited in §3. 1 and for the explanation for the nongemination of/r/. An earlier version of this manuscript was presented at the First Old World Conference in Phonology at Leiden in January 2003, the Friedrich Schiller Universität in Jena in May 2003 and Indiana University in Bloomington in January 2004. Thanks are due to the respective audience for valuable comments. 
245 1 0 |a ON THE NONGEMINATION OF /r/ IN WEST GERMANIC TWENTY-ONE YEARS LATER  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [T. A. HALL] 
540 |a © 2004 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston 
773 0 |t Folia Linguistica Historica  |d De Gruyter Mouton  |g 38/Historica vol. 25,1-2(2004), 211-234  |x 0168-647X  |q 38:Historica vol. 25,1-2<211  |1 2004  |2 38  |o flih 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2004.25.1-2.211  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2004.25.1-2.211  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a HALL  |D T. A.  |u I would like to thank Carlos Gussenhoven, Silke Hamann, Wolfgang Kehrein, and Marzena Zygis for comments on earlier incarnations of this article. Special thanks are due to Carlos Gussenhoven, who communicated to me similar ideas concerning the phonetic motivation for the constraints posited in §3. 1 and for the explanation for the nongemination of/r/. An earlier version of this manuscript was presented at the First Old World Conference in Phonology at Leiden in January 2003, the Friedrich Schiller Universität in Jena in May 2003 and Indiana University in Bloomington in January 2004. Thanks are due to the respective audience for valuable comments 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Folia Linguistica Historica  |d De Gruyter Mouton  |g 38/Historica vol. 25,1-2(2004), 211-234  |x 0168-647X  |q 38:Historica vol. 25,1-2<211  |1 2004  |2 38  |o flih 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter