<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">378913301</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180305123547.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161128e200409  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1515/REST.2004.171</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/REST.2004.171</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Paper Splitting: Systematisation, Quality Control and Risk Minimisation</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Eva Galinsky, Anna Haberditzl]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Clivage du papier</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">systématisation, contrôle de qualité et minimisation du risque</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">An adaptable and repeatable procedural routine, for the splitting of biologically decomposed historical documents and based on risk assessment and experience is defined. Fault analysis, standardisation and evaluation of the paper splitting procedure are compiled. The process is based on mechanical and physical qualities, which determine the character of an item and to some extent influence each other. Therefore, care must be taken not to neglect individual parameters. The realisation and compilation of the several parameters and their mutual influence enable a systematic and risk conscious implementation of the splitting process. A process control system has enabled, not only threatening complications to be recognised in advance and avoided in time, but also improvement in the final result. By means of the appraisal of the final result on the basis of reproducible criteria the success of the splitting is measured and defects are recognised. Evaluation of the final result and fault analysis leads in turn to the optimisation of the final procedure and minimises risk. Neglecting individual points for reasons of economy will save nothing. Standardisation and quality control, however, have a positive influence on the quality of the final outcome and on the number of items that can be successfully treated.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© 2004 K. G. Saur Verlag GmbH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Galinsky</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eva</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Erhaltung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut, (Institute for Preservation of Archival and Library Material), Schillerplatz 11, D-71638 Ludwigsburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Haberditzl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anna</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Erhaltung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut, (Institute for Preservation of Archival and Library Material), Schillerplatz 11, D-71638 Ludwigsburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Restaurator</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/3(2004-09), 171-198</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0034-5806</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:3&lt;171</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">REST</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/REST.2004.171</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/REST.2004.171</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Galinsky</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Eva</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Erhaltung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut, (Institute for Preservation of Archival and Library Material), Schillerplatz 11, D-71638 Ludwigsburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Haberditzl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anna</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Erhaltung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut, (Institute for Preservation of Archival and Library Material), Schillerplatz 11, D-71638 Ludwigsburg, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Restaurator</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">25/3(2004-09), 171-198</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0034-5806</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">25:3&lt;171</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">25</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">REST</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
