Antitrust Claims: Why Exclude Them from The Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention ?
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Global Jurist Advances, 4/2(2004-10-06)
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378913549 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123547.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20041006xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1535-1661.1131 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1535-1661.1131 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Radicati di Brozolo |D Luca G. |u 1Universita' Cattolica di Milano, luca.radicati@beplex.com | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antitrust Claims: Why Exclude Them from The Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention ? |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The exclusion of antitrust claims from the draft of the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments is unjustified and counterintuitive in the face of the increasing emphasis on private antitrust enforcement. The article examines the issues of forum selection agreements and the forum for actions for damages and the reasons for a reconsideration of the problem by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The analysis takes into account recent developments in the approaches to extraterritorial jurisdiction and of the increased role of party autonomy in conflicts jurisdiction which favors recourse to forum selection and arbitration even in the presence of mandatory rules. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a International Competition Law |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Antitrust |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a private enforcement |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a jurisdiction |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a recognition of judgments |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a forum selection clauses |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Global Jurist Advances |d De Gruyter |g 4/2(2004-10-06) |q 4:2 |1 2004 |2 4 |o gj | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1661.1131 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1661.1131 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Radicati di Brozolo |D Luca G. |u 1Universita' Cattolica di Milano, luca.radicati@beplex.com | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Global Jurist Advances |d De Gruyter |g 4/2(2004-10-06) |q 4:2 |1 2004 |2 4 |o gj | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||