Antitrust Claims: Why Exclude Them from The Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention ?

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Global Jurist Advances, 4/2(2004-10-06)
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378913549
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378913549
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123547.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20041006xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.2202/1535-1661.1131  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1535-1661.1131 
100 1 |a Radicati di Brozolo  |D Luca G.  |u 1Universita' Cattolica di Milano, luca.radicati@beplex.com 
245 1 0 |a Antitrust Claims: Why Exclude Them from The Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention ?  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo] 
520 3 |a The exclusion of antitrust claims from the draft of the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments is unjustified and counterintuitive in the face of the increasing emphasis on private antitrust enforcement. The article examines the issues of forum selection agreements and the forum for actions for damages and the reasons for a reconsideration of the problem by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The analysis takes into account recent developments in the approaches to extraterritorial jurisdiction and of the increased role of party autonomy in conflicts jurisdiction which favors recourse to forum selection and arbitration even in the presence of mandatory rules. 
540 |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston 
690 7 |a International Competition Law  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Antitrust  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a private enforcement  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a jurisdiction  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a recognition of judgments  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a forum selection clauses  |2 nationallicence 
773 0 |t Global Jurist Advances  |d De Gruyter  |g 4/2(2004-10-06)  |q 4:2  |1 2004  |2 4  |o gj 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1661.1131  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-1661.1131  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Radicati di Brozolo  |D Luca G.  |u 1Universita' Cattolica di Milano, luca.radicati@beplex.com 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Global Jurist Advances  |d De Gruyter  |g 4/2(2004-10-06)  |q 4:2  |1 2004  |2 4  |o gj 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter