caa a22 4500 378919245 CHVBK 20180305123601.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20040211xx s 000 0 eng 10.2202/1565-3404.1087 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1565-3404.1087 Nolte Georg 1University of Goettingen Preventive Use of Force and Preventive Killings: Moves into a Different Legal Order [Elektronische Daten] [Georg Nolte] According to the traditional view, preventive uses of force between states and preventive killings of individuals, to be legal, have one basic requirement in common, namely, the requirement of the immediacy of the threat posed. The U.S. National Security Strategy of September 2002, the so-called Bush doctrine, and the so-called Israeli policy of "targeted killing" challenge precisely this core requirement for the preventive use of force against states and against individuals. The author argues that abandonment of the traditional standard is unwarranted, even when taking into account the new kinds of threats that have arisen in recent times. Such abandonment, he argues, would risk transforming indispensable foundations of the international law on the use of force and on human rights. ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston Theoretical Inquiries in Law De Gruyter 5/1(2004-02-11), 111-129 5:1<111 2004 5 til https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1087 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1087 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Nolte Georg 1University of Goettingen NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Theoretical Inquiries in Law De Gruyter 5/1(2004-02-11), 111-129 5:1<111 2004 5 til CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter