Targeted Killing
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378919288 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123601.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20040211xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.2202/1565-3404.1090 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.2202/1565-3404.1090 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Statman |D Daniel | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Targeted Killing |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Daniel Statman] |
| 520 | 3 | |a The purpose of this paper is to provide a philosophical defense for targeted killings in the wars against terror. The paper argues that if one accepts the moral legitimacy of the large-scale killing of combatants in conventional (what are soon to be called "old-fashioned")wars, one cannot object - on moral grounds - to the targeted killing of terrorists in wars against terror. If one rejects this legitimacy, one must object to all killing in war, targeted and non-targeted alike, and thus not support the view, which is criticized here, that targeted killings are particularly disturbing from a moral point of view. | |
| 540 | |a ©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Theoretical Inquiries in Law |d De Gruyter |g 5/1(2004-02-11), 179-198 |q 5:1<179 |1 2004 |2 5 |o til | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1090 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1090 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Statman |D Daniel | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Theoretical Inquiries in Law |d De Gruyter |g 5/1(2004-02-11), 179-198 |q 5:1<179 |1 2004 |2 5 |o til | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||