Submorphematische Motiviertheit als Grammatikalisierungsergebnis: zur Grammatikalisierung von Reflexivpronomen [Submorphematic motivatedness as a result of grammaticalization: on the grammaticalization of reflexive pronouns]
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378924400 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123613.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20040607xx s 000 0 ger | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.233 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.233 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Leiss |D Elisabeth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Submorphematische Motiviertheit als Grammatikalisierungsergebnis: zur Grammatikalisierung von Reflexivpronomen [Submorphematic motivatedness as a result of grammaticalization: on the grammaticalization of reflexive pronouns] |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Elisabeth Leiss] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Grammaticization theory gives a lot of evidence that grammatical polysemy is the normal case whereas grammatical homonymy is more and more seen to be just a case of undetected polysemy. Identical forms are linked together by a common path of grammaticization. They are therefore necessarily related in meaning. Due to this insight Grammaticization theory has completely undermined an important part of the axiomatics of linguistics: The so-called arbitrariness of the relation between meaning and form may be nothing more than a yet undetected motivated relation between different stages of grammaticizational processes. The present paper aims at finding undetected polysemy even at a submorphematic level. In order to exemplify this approach the German reflexive pronoun sich is splitted into the segments s- and -ich. It is suggested that the homonymy of the second segment with the first personal pronoun ich is just a case of undetected polysemy. The intention of this at first glance donquijotical approach to morphology is to provoke believers in homonymy to make more efforts to prove their own approach. | |
| 540 | |a Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure |2 nationallicence | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/2(2004-06-07), 233-244 |x 0301-3294 |q 32:2<233 |1 2004 |2 32 |o zfgl | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.233 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.233 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Leiss |D Elisabeth | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/2(2004-06-07), 233-244 |x 0301-3294 |q 32:2<233 |1 2004 |2 32 |o zfgl | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||