caa a22 4500 378924427 CHVBK 20180305123613.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20040607xx s 000 0 ger 10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.188 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.188 Mortelmans Tanja Grammatikalisierung und Subjektivierung: Traugott und Langacker revisited [Grammaticalization and subjectivization: Traugott and Langacker revisited] [Elektronische Daten] [Tanja Mortelmans] Grammaticalization and subjectification are often intertwined. Starting from the observation that two different models of subjectification are often made use of in the grammaticalization literature (Langacker's and Traugott's), we will address the question what the main differences between these models are and which consequences these differences have for applying them to concrete grammaticalization phenomena. Moreover, it will be shown that particular restrictions regarding the use of the German "future” auxiliary werden - which is not as strongly grammaticalized as its English counterpart will - cannot be accounted for if one adopts Traugott's concept of subjectification. Langacker's model, on the other hand, seems to be able to capture the difference between werden and will to the extent that a lesser degree of subjectivity associated with the German verb is mirrored by a lesser degree of grammaticalization. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG Grammar, syntax, linguistic structure nationallicence Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik Walter de Gruyter 32/2(2004-06-07), 188-209 0301-3294 32:2<188 2004 32 zfgl https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.188 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.188 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Mortelmans Tanja NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik Walter de Gruyter 32/2(2004-06-07), 188-209 0301-3294 32:2<188 2004 32 zfgl CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter