caa a22 4500 37893287X CHVBK 20180305123634.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161128e20040201xx s 000 0 ger 10.14315/zee-2004-0117 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.14315/zee-2004-0117 Märkt Stephan Josef-Ries-Straße 11 a D-99086 Erfurt Braucht der Markt eine Minimalmoral? [Elektronische Daten] [Stephan Märkt] Many authors recently tried to show that markets don't have tobe based on morals as ordering principles. This paper intends to elaborate on two missing aspects in this debate: Firstly, a well-founded critique of this thesis traces back to Durkheim and Parsons. Their arguments on these critical points will bring new insights into the debate of how order is established. Secondly, many authors Iimit their studies to simple game theory-based arguments and on reflections on plausibility conceming the power of the state to enforce the law without explaining steps and conditions for the evidence of the suggested processes. This papertri es to fill some of these gaps; it will show that there are good arguments for real markets based on law and especially on morals to reach a high Ievel of division of labour © 2014 by Gütersloher Verlagshaus Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik Gütersloher Verlagshaus 48/1(2004-02-01), 119-134 48:1<119 2004 48 zee https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2004-0117 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2004-0117 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Märkt Stephan Josef-Ries-Straße 11 a D-99086 Erfurt NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik Gütersloher Verlagshaus 48/1(2004-02-01), 119-134 48:1<119 2004 48 zee CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-gruyter