<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">378935291</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180305123639.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161128e20041125xx      s     000 0 ger  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1515/nzst.2004.46.4.467</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/nzst.2004.46.4.467</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Barth</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans-Martin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1. Auf dem Schaumrück 31, 35041 Marburg.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Egozentrizität, Mystik und christlicher Glaube: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Ernst Tugendhat</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Hans-Martin Barth]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The philosopher Ernst Tugendhat interprets mysticism as a legitimate consequence of egocentricity. For him mysticism is not a natural phenomenon, but one which is intentionally sought and produced to allow the individual to withdraw from his or her concrete circumstances. Thus mysticism invites us to renounce and to retract desires, while religion invites us to project desires and to transform our circumstances. For Tugendhat, religion, especially in its theistic forms, is a mistake, whereas mysticism, which needs no God(s), is acceptable. A fuller anthropology, however, would accept that egocentricity can have very ambiguous consequences. Which ones are legitimate, and on what grounds? Moreover there is not just one single or general type of mysticism. So which type is helpful? From where does the bifurcation between mysticism and religion derive? Why, even leaving aside the fact that renunciation and transformation are not necessarily opposites, should renunciation and receding be regarded as more adequate than transformation? Finally, with regard to Christianity, Christian faith is Trinitarian, not theistic, and it therefore transcends traditional religious and philosophical alternatives, even that between religion and mysticism.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Walter de Gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Religion: general</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Christianity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/4(2004-11-25), 467-482</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-3517</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:4&lt;467</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">nzst</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/nzst.2004.46.4.467</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/nzst.2004.46.4.467</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Barth</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans-Martin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">1. Auf dem Schaumrück 31, 35041 Marburg</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/4(2004-11-25), 467-482</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-3517</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:4&lt;467</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">nzst</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
