<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">378936123</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180305123641.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161128e20041023xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1515/ANGL.2004.63</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/ANGL.2004.63</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Merten</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kai</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Giessen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;To turn the gazer's spirit into stone”: Deutsche und britische Medusen in der Repräsentationskrise des 19. Jahrhunderts</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Kai Merten]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This essay explores the reception of the Medusa myth in 19th-century German and British writing, with Foucault's thesis of a shift from a taxonomic order to an episteme centered on the human being as a starting point. In the texts studied, the Medusa myth becomes a highly charged site of both epistemic reassurance and unsettling. The Medusan scenes in Goethe's work testify to an attempt at setting at rest the discontents of human self-representation by underscoring the gender difference between the male hero / onlooker and the female figure looked at. In contrast, Shelley's ekphrastic poem - in many ways a reaction to Goethe's Medusa - imagines the collapse of all differences underlying human representation and points up the violence both within representation and in a world without it. Thus, what Shelley passes on to later writers is a problem and not a solution. William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones' text-image collaborations on the Medusa myth introduce the male hero / onlooker as a representational object. Thereby, however, epistemic differentiations are not reinstalled but once more unsettled in what is in one case an uncanny human sameness under an all-encompassing representational order and in the other the detachment of a female discourse. The latter dimension is further explored in C. F. Meyer's brilliant Medusa poem of 1892 - another instance of across-the-Channel reception -, which points the way towards the feminist episteme advocated in some 20th-century readings of the myth. Taken together, however, the Medusa receptions of the 19th century warn against segregationist reactions to the challenge of human representation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">© Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH, Tübingen 2003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">122/1(2004-10-23), 63-88</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0340-5222</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">122:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">122</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ANGL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/ANGL.2004.63</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/ANGL.2004.63</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Merten</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kai</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Giessen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Walter de Gruyter GmbH &amp; Co. KG</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">122/1(2004-10-23), 63-88</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0340-5222</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">122:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2004</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">122</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ANGL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-gruyter</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
