Executive Remuneration and Corporate Governance in the EU: Convergence, Divergence, and Reform Perspectives

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Guido Ferrarini, Niamh Moloney]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
European Company and Financial Law Review, 1/3(2004-10-01), 251-339
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 37893726X
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 37893726X
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123643.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20041001xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/ecfr.2004.1.3.251  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/ecfr.2004.1.3.251 
245 0 0 |a Executive Remuneration and Corporate Governance in the EU: Convergence, Divergence, and Reform Perspectives  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Guido Ferrarini, Niamh Moloney] 
520 3 |a This article examines the current controversy as to the effectiveness of executive remuneration as a tool of corporate governance but places the analysis in the particular context of the dispersed ownership/blockholding ownership faultline which runs across European corporate governance. It reveals that there is a close relationship between governance systems and the sophistication and rigour of the regulatory response to executive remuneration. To place the European responses to the executive remuneration question in context, Part I sets out the main theoretical arguments which frame the executive remuneration debate and examines the link between remuneration and corporate governance. Part II examines, in the light of the preceding discussion, the regulatory strategies adopted by EU Member States with regard to executive remuneration and reveals the extent to which their responses track corporate governance systems in terms of sophistication and degree of intervention in remuneration practices, particularly with respect to disclosure. Overall, regulatory strategies focus on company disclosure and corporate governance structures, and are grounded both in public regulation and in corporate governance best practices. Part III discusses reform perspectives with particular reference to the 2002 Winter Report and the 2003 Company Law Action Plan. 
540 |a © Walter de Gruyter 
690 7 |a EU law: financial, taxation, commercial, industrial  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Ferrarini  |D Guido  |u University of Genoa and European Corporate Governance Institute  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moloney  |D Niamh  |u Queen's University Belfast and European Corporate Governance Institute  |4 aut 
773 0 |t European Company and Financial Law Review  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 1/3(2004-10-01), 251-339  |x 1613-2548  |q 1:3<251  |1 2004  |2 1  |o ecfr 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2004.1.3.251  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2004.1.3.251  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Ferrarini  |D Guido  |u University of Genoa and European Corporate Governance Institute  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Moloney  |D Niamh  |u Queen's University Belfast and European Corporate Governance Institute  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t European Company and Financial Law Review  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 1/3(2004-10-01), 251-339  |x 1613-2548  |q 1:3<251  |1 2004  |2 1  |o ecfr 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter