A 2 hour versus the 3 hour 100 g glucose tolerance test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378938061 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123645.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e20040709xx s 000 0 eng | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/JPM.2004.059 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/JPM.2004.059 | ||
| 245 | 0 | 2 | |a A 2 hour versus the 3 hour 100 g glucose tolerance test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [P. Jakobi, I. Solt, A. Weissman] |
| 520 | 3 | |a Aim: To determine how the omission of the third hour glucose measurement of the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) affects the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: Retrospective chart review of 876 women delivered in a tertiary care hospital in Israel during a three-year period, who underwent a 100 g 3 hour oral GTT following an abnormal 50 g glucose screen. GDM was diagnosed according to the "criterion standard” accepted in the Fourth International Workshop Conference on GDM. The results of the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT were then retrospectively re-evaluated by omission of the third hour plasma glucose measurement from the "criterion standard”. Results: GDM was diagnosed in 28.4% of the study patients, while the omission of the third hour glucose measurement resulted in a 26.4% diagnosis of GDM. The perinatal data of the 18-omitted cases suggests that their exclusion from the GDM group would not have altered substantially the perinatal outcome of the study cohort. Conclusions: A 100 g 2 hour oral GTT is a simple and economic alternative to the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT. | |
| 540 | |a Copyright © 2004 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG | ||
| 690 | 7 | |a Human reproduction, growth & development |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Gynaecology & obstetrics |2 nationallicence | |
| 690 | 7 | |a Paediatric medicine |2 nationallicence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jakobi |D P. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Solt |D I. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weissman |D A. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/4(2004-07-09), 320-322 |x 0300-5577 |q 32:4<320 |1 2004 |2 32 |o jpme | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.059 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.059 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Jakobi |D P. |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Solt |D I. |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 700 |E 1- |a Weissman |D A. |4 aut | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine |d Walter de Gruyter |g 32/4(2004-07-09), 320-322 |x 0300-5577 |q 32:4<320 |1 2004 |2 32 |o jpme | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||