Amnioreduction in patients with bulging prolapsed membranes out of the cervix and vaginal orifice in cervical cerclage

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Y. Makino, I. Makino, H. Tsujioka, T. Kawarabayashi]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 32/2(2004-03-15), 140-148
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 378942441
LEADER caa a22 4500
001 378942441
003 CHVBK
005 20180305123655.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 161128e20040315xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.1515/JPM.2004.026  |2 doi 
035 |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/JPM.2004.026 
245 0 0 |a Amnioreduction in patients with bulging prolapsed membranes out of the cervix and vaginal orifice in cervical cerclage  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Y. Makino, I. Makino, H. Tsujioka, T. Kawarabayashi] 
520 3 |a Objective: To determine whether an amnioreduction via bulging membranes (AVBM) and cerclage could be useful in 17 women with singleton gestations demonstrating hourglass membranes bulging out of the cervix or vaginal orifice. Methods: We used the following selection criteria for AVBM under ultrasonographic guidance using a peit needle because of undetectable cervical edges: (type 1) the bag of membranes protruded beyond the inlet of the vagina; (type 2) the bag of huge membranes completely occupied the vagina. Results: Eight patients (three cases of type 1 and five of type 2) were successful in AVBM and cerclage at 22.1±2.2 weeks gestation (range 19-24 weeks), and mean birth weight was 1,048.1±801.6 g (range 302- 2,688 g). Although the diameter of the forewater by transabdominal ultrasonography (cm) was higher than in the nine patients without AVBM (6.7±1.1 versus 4.1±0.7 cm, p=0.002), the prolongation of pregnancy (32.9±46.2 days; range 2-133 days) was the same as in patients without AVBM (36.9±39.3 day, p=1.000). Conclusion: It is important that every effort should be made to perform cervical cerclage at or before 26 weeks of gestation, even in women with type 1 or 2. 
540 |a Copyright © 2004 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG 
690 7 |a Human reproduction, growth & development  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Gynaecology & obstetrics  |2 nationallicence 
690 7 |a Paediatric medicine  |2 nationallicence 
700 1 |a Makino  |D Y.  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Makino  |D I.  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tsujioka  |D H.  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kawarabayashi  |D T.  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 32/2(2004-03-15), 140-148  |x 0300-5577  |q 32:2<140  |1 2004  |2 32  |o jpme 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.026  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
908 |D 1  |a research article  |2 jats 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 856  |E 40  |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2004.026  |q text/html  |z Onlinezugriff via DOI 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Makino  |D Y.  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Makino  |D I.  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Tsujioka  |D H.  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Kawarabayashi  |D T.  |4 aut 
950 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |P 773  |E 0-  |t Journal of Perinatal Medicine  |d Walter de Gruyter  |g 32/2(2004-03-15), 140-148  |x 0300-5577  |q 32:2<140  |1 2004  |2 32  |o jpme 
900 7 |b CC0  |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0  |2 nationallicence 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B NATIONALLICENCE  |F NATIONALLICENCE  |b NL-gruyter