An Interpretation of the Philosophy of Niels Bohr, in the light of the philosophies of Kant and Husserl
Gespeichert in:
Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Rom Harré]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2004
Enthalten in:
SATS, 5/2(2004-11), 5-13
Format:
Artikel (online)
Online Zugang:
| LEADER | caa a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378942964 | ||
| 003 | CHVBK | ||
| 005 | 20180305123657.0 | ||
| 007 | cr unu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161128e200411 xx s 000 0 mul | ||
| 024 | 7 | 0 | |a 10.1515/SATS.2004.5 |2 doi |
| 035 | |a (NATIONALLICENCE)gruyter-10.1515/SATS.2004.5 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Harré |D Rom |u Department of Psychology, Georgetown University. harre@georgetown.edu | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An Interpretation of the Philosophy of Niels Bohr, in the light of the philosophies of Kant and Husserl |h [Elektronische Daten] |c [Rom Harré] |
| 520 | 3 | |a In order to develop the insight that is worked out by Brock (Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Logos, 2003), that the philosophy of quantum mechanics should parallel Kant's philosophy of natural science, some preliminary analyses of key concepts need to be done. Initiated by Niels Bohr (Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, John Wiley and Sons, 1958), the concept of ‘complementarity' has played a major role in the interpretation of quantum theory. However, the exact place it occupies in respect of the logical form of the relation of complementarity between descriptive predicates has not been spelled out in detail to my knowledge. Complementary predicates exclude one another as simultaneous attributions to the same subject. Exactly what form does this exclusion take? How is it related to the basic exclusion-of-predicates principle, the logical law of non-contradiction? | |
| 540 | |a © Philosophia Press 2004 | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t SATS |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |g 5/2(2004-11), 5-13 |x 1600-1974 |q 5:2<5 |1 2004 |2 5 |o SATS | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2004.5 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI |
| 908 | |D 1 |a research article |2 jats | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 856 |E 40 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS.2004.5 |q text/html |z Onlinezugriff via DOI | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 100 |E 1- |a Harré |D Rom |u Department of Psychology, Georgetown University. harre@georgetown.edu | ||
| 950 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |P 773 |E 0- |t SATS |d Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG |g 5/2(2004-11), 5-13 |x 1600-1974 |q 5:2<5 |1 2004 |2 5 |o SATS | ||
| 900 | 7 | |b CC0 |u http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |2 nationallicence | |
| 898 | |a BK010053 |b XK010053 |c XK010000 | ||
| 949 | |B NATIONALLICENCE |F NATIONALLICENCE |b NL-gruyter | ||