caa a22 4500 386321469 CHVBK 20180307111628.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e19881001xx s 000 0 eng 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1988.tb00095.x doi S0017257X00006254 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1111/j.1477-7053.1988.tb00095.x Streeck Wolfgang Comment on Ronald Dore, ‘Rigidities in the Labour Market' [Elektronische Daten] [Wolfgang Streeck] AT THE END OF HIS REVIEW OF LABOUR MARKET RIGIDITIES in advanced capitalist societies, Ronald Dore presents us with the classical and highly uncomfortable dilemma between equity and efficiency. There are two kinds of rigidities, he suggests: those that improve economic performance while giving rise to social inequality and societal dualism, and those that promote equity while detracting from efficiency. Unlike neo-classical economics, Dore recognises that to be efficient, advanced production systems require institutions above and beyond the market — such as long-term employment, internal labour markets, and ‘sticky' mechanisms of wage determination. But these institutions, he insists, are not, or no longer, defensible in terms of the Marshallian tradition of industrial and social citizenship. Social justice and equality, according to Dore, are vested today in a second type of ‘ridigities' — the redistributive apparatus of the welfare state — which, unlike the first, extracts an ‘efficiency price' from the economy. Government and Opposition Cambridge University Press 23/4(1988-10-01), 413-423 0017-257X 23:4<413 1988 23 GOV https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1988.tb00095.x text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1988.tb00095.x text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Streeck Wolfgang NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Government and Opposition Cambridge University Press 23/4(1988-10-01), 413-423 0017-257X 23:4<413 1988 23 GOV CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge