<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">386321841</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180307111629.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161130e198801  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1079/BJN19880010</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">S000711458800011X</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1079/BJN19880010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by sheep</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">4. The effect of additives representing the primary tastes on sham intakes by oesophageal-fistulated sheep*</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">1. Sheep with oesophageal fistulas were sham-fed on pelleted lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay to assess the palatability of added chemicals representing the tastes of sweet (sucrose), sour (hydrochloric acid), salt (sodium chloride), bitter (urea) and umami (monosodium glutamate; MSG). 2. Plain pellets and four concentrations of each chemical were sham-fed for 30 min after 5·5 h deprivation in 5x5 Latin-square experiments following a period of adaptation feeding. 3. Sucrose, at concentrations of 15-120 g/kg air-dried pellets, depressed intakes with a linear relation between intake (I; g) and concentration (C; g/kg): I = 1001-3·42C. 4. HCl at 6·25-25·0 g/kg pellets had no effect on sham intakes but at 50 g/kg reduced them by 50% of control (P &lt; 0·05). 5. NaCl at 50-200 g/kg increased sham intakes by 26% (P &lt; 0·01) with no evidence of a dose-related effect. 6. Urea at 10-80 g/kg decreased sham intakes by 26·9% (P &lt; 0·01) with no evidence of a dose-related effect. 7. MSG at 5-40 g/kg in two experiments increased sham intakes by 16·1 and 40·8% (P &lt; 0·05). In another experiment at 1-8 g/kg there wasno significant effect. 8. When palatability and post-ingestive effects are separated by sham-feeding, the effect of added chemicals on intake may be completely different from when they are ingestednormally (e.g. NaCl and sucrose). This newly developed technique enables the palatabilityeffect of feed additives to be tested critically and economically.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grovum</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W. L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Chapman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H. W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">British Journal of Nutrition</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">59/1(1988-01), 63-72</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0007-1145</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">59:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1988</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">59</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">BJN</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19880010</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19880010</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Grovum</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W. L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Chapman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H. W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">British Journal of Nutrition</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">59/1(1988-01), 63-72</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0007-1145</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">59:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1988</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">59</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">BJN</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
