caa a22 4500 386335400 CHVBK 20180307111732.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e198901 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0841820900000941 doi S0841820900000941 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0841820900000941 Johnston Darlene M. Native Rights as Collective Rights: A Question of Group Self-Preservation [Elektronische Daten] [Darlene M. Johnston] In his 1972 paper commissioned by the Inquiry on the Position of the French Language and on Language Rights in Quebec, Professor Francois Chevrette questioned the legal significance of the notion of "collective rights”: The expression "collective rights” is not a term of art and it is significant both that it is found in the vocabulary of political philosophy and not found in the vocabulary of the jurist-technician. The reason is probably that the qualification "collective” attached to the word "rights” refers to the philosophical foundations of such rights much more than to their legal attributes or to their judicial implementation. Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1989 The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 2/1(1989-01), 19-34 0841-8209 2:1<19 1989 2 CJL https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900000941 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900000941 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Johnston Darlene M. NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 2/1(1989-01), 19-34 0841-8209 2:1<19 1989 2 CJL CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge