caa a22 4500 386335532 CHVBK 20180307111732.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e198907 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0841820900002824 doi S0841820900002824 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0841820900002824 Bogart John Adjudication, Validity, and Theories of Law [Elektronische Daten] [John Bogart] Although Positivism and Natural Law theories seem to be mutually exclusive theories regarding the law, one might be able to salvage the attractive features of both theories by confirming each theory to a different area of judicial life. The most promising line of demarcation is to confine Positivism to theories of validity, and to confine Natural Law to theories of adjudication. This strategy has been very ably outlined in a paper by David Brink, which I shall use as the springboard for this essay. Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1989 The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 2/2(1989-07), 163-170 0841-8209 2:2<163 1989 2 CJL https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002824 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900002824 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Bogart John NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Cambridge University Press 2/2(1989-07), 163-170 0841-8209 2:2<163 1989 2 CJL CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge