<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">386356572</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180307111855.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161130e198907  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1017/S0266462300007376</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">S0266462300007376</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0266462300007376</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Black</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Douglas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Royal College of Physicians of London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Expensive Medical and Surgical Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Douglas Black]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The very title - &quot;Expensive Medical and Surgical Technology” - expresses in coded form a myth that is widely prevalent among those who consider the political and economic aspects of health care. Strangely, it is a myth that finds favor mainly at the extreme ends of the range of attitudes toward health care. Monetarists see it as an incentive toward increasing private provision of health care, while extreme egalitarians see it as another example of unjust privilege. The content of the myth is that there is a definable group of costly procedures, which can somehow be isolated from the general practice of medicine and surgery, after which such procedures can either be made the subject of special private provision or, alternatively, discarded from a rationed system of health care.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/3(1989-07), 308-312</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0266-4623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:3&lt;308</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1989</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">THC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300007376</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">editorial</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300007376</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Black</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Douglas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Royal College of Physicians of London</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">5/3(1989-07), 308-312</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0266-4623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">5:3&lt;308</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1989</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">5</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">THC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
