caa a22 4500 386365431 CHVBK 20180307111931.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130s1989 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0012217300015973 doi S0012217300015973 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0012217300015973 Bernstein Mark University of Texas Fatalism and Time [Elektronische Daten] [Mark Bernstein] A certain mythology has been perpetuated in discussions of philosophy of time. It has been contended that the adoption of a particular theory of time, what I will call the "Non-dynamic Theory of Time” (NDTT) results in a commitment to Fatalism. This unwanted, if not intolerable baggage, is said to be avoided only by jettisoning NDTT and espousing what I will call the "Dynamic Theory of Time” (DTT). What I hope to show is that the truth of the matter is almost completely the reverse; while NDTT has absolutely no Fatalistic ramifications, DTT, when it is conjoined with a most plausible supposition, does. Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1989 Dialogue Cambridge University Press 28/3(1989), 461-471 0012-2173 28:3<461 1989 28 DIA https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300015973 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300015973 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Bernstein Mark University of Texas NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Dialogue Cambridge University Press 28/3(1989), 461-471 0012-2173 28:3<461 1989 28 DIA CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge