<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">386377855</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180307112028.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161130e198912  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1017/S0143385700005289</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">S0143385700005289</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0143385700005289</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The absolute continuity of the conjugation of certain diffeomorphisms of the circle</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Let f be an orientation preserving -diffeomorphism of the circle. If the rotation number α = ρ(f) is irrational and log Df is of bounded variation then, by a wellknown theorem of Denjoy, f is conjugate to the rigid rotation Rα. The conjugation means that there exists an essentially unique homeomorphism h of the circle such that f = h−lRαh. The general problem of relating the smoothness of h to that of f under suitable diophantine conditions on α has been studied extensively (cf. [H1], [KO], [Y] and the references given there). At the bottom of the scale of smoothness for f there is a theorem of M. Herman [H2] which states that if Df is absolutely continuous and D log Df Lp, p &gt; 1, α = ρ (f) is of ‘constant type' which means ‘the coefficients in the continued fraction expansion of α are bounded', and if f is a perturbation of Rα, then h is absolutely continuous. Our purpose in this paper is to give a different proof and an improved version of Herman's theorem. The main difference in the result is that we do not need to assume that f is close to Rα; the proof is very different from Herman's and is very much in the spirit of [KO].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Katznelson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Mathematics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ornstein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Mathematics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/4(1989-12), 681-690</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0143-3857</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:4&lt;681</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1989</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ETS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385700005289</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385700005289</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Katznelson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Mathematics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ornstein</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Mathematics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/4(1989-12), 681-690</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0143-3857</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:4&lt;681</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1989</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">ETS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
