caa a22 4500 386387206 CHVBK 20180307112102.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e198906 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0034412500001840 doi S0034412500001840 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0034412500001840 Craig William Lane Department of Philosophy, Westmont College, California ‘Nice Soft Facts': Fischer on Foreknowledge [Elektronische Daten] [William Lane Craig] During the last several years, philosophers of religion have witnessed a long-drawn debate between Nelson Pike and John Fischer on the problems of theological fatalism, Fischer claiming in his most recent contribution to have proved that even if God's past beliefs are ‘nice soft facts', still theological fatalism cannot be averted. Unfortunately, this debate has not - at least it seems to this observer - served substantially either to clarify the issues involved or to move toward a resolution of the question, but has instead confused matters by its use of misleading terminology and diverted the discussion into unpromising side roads. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989 Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/2(1989-06), 235-246 0034-4125 25:2<235 1989 25 RES https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500001840 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500001840 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Craig William Lane Department of Philosophy, Westmont College, California NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/2(1989-06), 235-246 0034-4125 25:2<235 1989 25 RES CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge