caa a22 4500 386387478 CHVBK 20180307112103.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e198912 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0034412500020059 doi S0034412500020059 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0034412500020059 Gilman James E. Mary Baldwin College, Virginia, U.S.A. Reconceiving Miracles [Elektronische Daten] [James E. Gilman] The chief, but far from only, thinker to shape the modern discussion of miracles was David Hume. Ever since, his collaborating off-spring (both those who defend and those who reject the coherence of the idea of miracles) have routinely made several (false) assumptions about the laws of nature and the idea of miracles, which, together with the rich and varied debate arising from them, constitute what I shall refer to as the Humean tradition. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989 Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/4(1989-12), 477-487 0034-4125 25:4<477 1989 25 RES https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500020059 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500020059 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Gilman James E. Mary Baldwin College, Virginia, U.S.A NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/4(1989-12), 477-487 0034-4125 25:4<477 1989 25 RES CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge