caa a22 4500 386387575 CHVBK 20180307112103.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e198912 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0034412500020023 doi S0034412500020023 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0034412500020023 Lints Richard Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Massachusetts, U.S.A Irresistibility, Epistemic Warrant and Religious Belief [Elektronische Daten] [Richard Lints] It has been widely argued that beliefs in general are not under direct voluntary control. It is not the case that we can by decision of the will (however construed) decide what to believe or what to refrain from believing in many ordinary instances of believing. Doxastic voluntarism now seems a dubious doctrine at best, regardless of how emphatic Descartes and other traditional epistemologists seemed to be in their support of the doctrine. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989 Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/4(1989-12), 425-433 0034-4125 25:4<425 1989 25 RES https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500020023 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500020023 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Lints Richard Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Massachusetts, U.S.A NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Religious Studies Cambridge University Press 25/4(1989-12), 425-433 0034-4125 25:4<425 1989 25 RES CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge