caa a22 4500 38801833X CHVBK 20180307124917.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199811 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0066477400001118 doi S0066477400001118 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0066477400001118 Gee Emma University of Exeter Some Thoughts about the Fasti of James George Frazer [Elektronische Daten] [Emma Gee] The abridged version of The Golden Bough has in the 1990s alone been reissued in several paperback editions. This would have pleased its author, with his penchant for successive editions and modifications of his own works. Sir James Frazer is still being read, at least in epitome, despite the fact that his anthropological work is apparently considered something of a dinosaur. At the same time, bemused Classics undergraduates are still getting their first contact with Ovid's Fasti through Frazer's Loeb translation of 1931, and doing battle with his 1929 commentary as the only one available in English on Ovid's calendar-poem in its entirety. Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1998 Antichthon Cambridge University Press 32(1998-11), 64-90 0066-4774 32<64 1998 32 ANN https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400001118 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400001118 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Gee Emma University of Exeter NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Antichthon Cambridge University Press 32(1998-11), 64-90 0066-4774 32<64 1998 32 ANN CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge