<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">388038985</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180307125015.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161130e199812  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.2307/2586654</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">S0022481200014298</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.2307/2586654</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Weiermann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andreas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut Für Mathematische Logik Und Grundlagenforschung, Der Westfälischen Wilhelms-, Universität Münster, Einsteinstrasse 62, D-48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail: weierma@math.uni-muenster.de</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">How is it that infinitary methods can be applied to finitary mathematics? Gödel's T: a case study</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Andreas Weiermann]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Inspired by Pohlers' local predicativity approach to Pure Proof Theory and Howard's ordinal analysis of bar recursion of type zero we present a short, technically smooth and constructive strong normalization proof for Gödel's system T of primitive recursive functionals of finite types by constructing an ε0-recursive function []0: T → ω so that a reduces to b implies [a]0 &gt; [b]0. The construction of [ ]0 is based on a careful analysis of the Howard-Schütte treatment of Gödel's T and utilizes the collapsing function ψ: ε 0 → ω which has been developed by the author for a local predicativity style proof-theoretic analysis of PA. The construction of [ ]0 is also crucially based on ideas developed in the 1995 paper &quot;A proof of strongly uniform termination for Gödel's T by the method of local predicativity” by the author. The results on complexity bounds for the fragments of T which are obtained in this paper strengthen considerably the results of the 1995 paper. Indeed, for given n let Tn be the subsystem of T in which the recursors have type level less than or equal to n + 2. (By definition, case distinction functionals for every type are also contained in Tn .) As a corollary of the main theorem of this paper we obtain (reobtain?) optimal bounds for the Tn -derivation lengths in terms of ω+2-descent recursive functions. The derivation lengths of type one functionals from Tn (hence also their computational complexities) are classified optimally in terms of &lt;ω n+2 -descent recursive functions. In particular we obtain (reobtain?) that the derivation lengths function of a type one functional a ∈ T 0 is primitive recursive, thus any type one functional a in T 0 defines a primitive recursive function. Similarly we also obtain (reobtain?) a full classification of T 1 in terms of multiple recursion. As proof-theoretic corollaries we reobtain the classification of the IΣ n+1-provably recursive functions. Taking advantage from our finitistic and constructive treatment of the terms of Gödel's T we reobtain additionally (without employing continuous cut elimination techniques) that PRA + PRWO(ε0) ⊢ Π2 0 − Refl(PA) and PRA + PRWO(ω n+2) ⊢ Π2 0 − Refl(IΣ n+1), hence PRA + PRWO(ε0) ⊢ Con(PA) and PRA + PRWO(ω n+2) ⊢ Con(IΣ n+1). For programmatic reasons we outline in the introduction a vision of how to apply a certain type of infinitary methods to questions of finitary mathematics and recursion theory. We also indicate some connections between ordinals, term rewriting, recursion theory and computational complexity.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">The Journal of Symbolic Logic</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">63/4(1998-12), 1348-1370</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-4812</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">63:4&lt;1348</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1998</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">63</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">JSL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2307/2586654</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2307/2586654</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Weiermann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andreas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut Für Mathematische Logik Und Grundlagenforschung, Der Westfälischen Wilhelms-, Universität Münster, Einsteinstrasse 62, D-48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail: weierma@math.uni-muenster.de</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">The Journal of Symbolic Logic</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">63/4(1998-12), 1348-1370</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-4812</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">63:4&lt;1348</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1998</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">63</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">JSL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
