caa a22 4500 38804036X CHVBK 20180307125019.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199806 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S1053837200001887 doi S1053837200001887 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S1053837200001887 Weber Christian E. Reply to Brems [Elektronische Daten] [Christian E. Weber] My response to Brems's comment on my paper is, I hope, obvious and straightforward. First, it should be noted that in his section II, Brems is correct with one important exception. He is correct to note that the particular additive utility function in his equation (1) is not Cobb-Douglas. However, this correct conclusion does not imply, as Brems appears to believe it does, that it is impossible to write down an additive utility function which would generate the same indifference map, first-order conditions, and demand functions as a multiplicative Cobb-Douglas utility function Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998 Journal of the History of Economic Thought Cambridge University Press 20/2(1998-06), 213-214 1053-8372 20:2<213 1998 20 HET https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837200001887 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837200001887 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Weber Christian E. NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Journal of the History of Economic Thought Cambridge University Press 20/2(1998-06), 213-214 1053-8372 20:2<213 1998 20 HET CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge