caa a22 4500 388045604 CHVBK 20180307125036.0 cr unu---uuuuu 161130e199807 xx s 000 0 eng 10.1017/S0020589300062217 doi S0020589300062217 pii (NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0020589300062217 Schoenbaum Thomas J. WTO Dispute Settlement: Praise and Suggestions for Reform [Elektronische Daten] [Thomas J. Schoenbaum] We have now had three years' experience with the dispute-settlement process of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which came into existence as a result of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations on 1 January 1995. By any objective standard, this system of dispute settlement is a resounding success. Well over 100 cases have been brought to the WTO, and, as at the end of 1997, 25 cases had been settled at the consultation stage, 61 were under consultations and 36 were in or beyond the panel-appeal process. The newly created Appellate Body has decided nine cases, the quality of its opinions as well as those of the dispute-settlement panels is generally excellent. Member States of the WTO are complying with the rulings and recommendations adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO. Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 1998 International and Comparative Law Quarterly Cambridge University Press 47/3(1998-07), 647-658 0020-5893 47:3<647 1998 47 ILQ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300062217 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300062217 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Schoenbaum Thomas J. NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- International and Comparative Law Quarterly Cambridge University Press 47/3(1998-07), 647-658 0020-5893 47:3<647 1998 47 ILQ CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 nationallicence SWISSBIB 350973121 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-cambridge