<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">388048239</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180307125044.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161130e199810  xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1017/S0361233300006268</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">S0361233300006268</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">pii</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)cambridge-10.1017/S0361233300006268</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bond</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adrian</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Emerson's &quot;Transparent Eye-Ball” and James's &quot;Glass Eye”: Practical Transcendence</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Adrian Bond]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In the chapter of Nature (1836) entitled &quot;Language,” Emerson finds the &quot;root” of words to reside in &quot;material appearance.” The apparently opaque word &quot;supercilious” opens itself up, gives up (imagistically, even narratively) its literal meaning: the raising of the eyebrow. The Russian formalist Victor Shklovsky calls such literalisms &quot;internal form,” and if he engineers similar linguistic unpacking it is not simply to demonstrate etymological curiosities — why, for instance, as he argues in &quot;The Resurrection of the Word,” a candle called &quot;tallow,” hence one made of animal fats, should not be called in the next line of a poem a &quot;candle of ardent wax” (42, 43). There is more at stake than pedantry; both theorists seek to return the life-stuff to a dead language — or, in the resonating metaphor of resurrection, to bring dead matter back to life. The material of art &quot;must be alive and precious,” writes Shklovsky, and invoking that peculiar myth of the linguistic Fall, of which Derrida provides the least remediable version, he rues &quot;the journey from poetry to prose” (&quot;Resurrection,” 42-43, 44). Submitted to common usage, words eventually lose their formal integrity (whether the &quot;internal form” of &quot;image” or the &quot;external form” of &quot;sound”) (&quot;Resurrection,” 41). Emerson describes a similar degradation of language: &quot;As we go back in history, language becomes more picturesque, until its infancy, when it is all poetry” (CW, 1: 19).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Prospects</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23(1998-10), 39-58</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0361-2333</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23&lt;39</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1998</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">PTS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0361233300006268</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0361233300006268</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bond</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adrian</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Prospects</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23(1998-10), 39-58</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0361-2333</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23&lt;39</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1998</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">PTS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="b">CC0</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
